Unfortunately, it is no longer possible to leave comments to the sometimes brilliant posts of That's So Pants, so I thought I would post a link to her most recent missive on the subject of an anti-binge drinking campaign and leave a very long comment in the form of a blog post of my own.
Whilst I am no fan of people who get excessively drunk and behave badly (particularly when they cause damage to property or wake me up as they sing their way home at 2am), I do agree with Ms Pants that these sorts of campaigns are a waste of time and money.
Funilly enough, Sir Bruin and I were only talking about this with No2 (Policeman) son last time he was home for the weekend. Binge drinking is not new; particularly in Britain. Our continental cousins appear to be much better at social moderate drinking than the British and this is has been the case for at least a thousand years. Contemporary accounts of the Battle of Hastings suggest that while the Norman troops spent the eve of the battle making quiet preparations, the English troops got thoroughly rat-arsed and were somewhat hung-over during the battle. An (unaccredited) piece of writing from 1066 states "The English, being revelling before, had in the morning their brains arrested for the arrearages of the ingested fumes of the former night – and were no better than drunk when they came to fight."
As Ms Pants observes in her article, during the hey-day of Britain's Industrial past, manual workers went from the factory gates directly to the pub without passing go. Certainly, our coal miners were renowned for heavy drinking in the late 19th and early 20th century and are reputed to have spent on average 25% of their earnings in the pub. Punch-ups in town centres on a Saturday night were probably more common back then than they are today. In the episode of "Who Do You Think You Are" that featured Griff Rhys Jones, he discovered that one of his ancestors, a miner, and had been killed in a fight where the involvement of drink was suspected.
I suppose that the government has to be seen to be doing something about problems like binge drinking in order to appease an aging population who read The Daily Mail and have forgotten what it is like to be young and high-spirited. However, I agree with Pants' observation that "people don’t like to be told what to do with their dwindling freedoms" and I would add my own opinion that the other reason this sort of campaign has no effect is that the people it is aimed it simply wont see it because they will be too busy getting drunk.
Got Any Quo?
16 hours ago













